Vitalik talks about smooth society. from Plurality philosophy in an incredibly oversized nutshell
A big theme of Plurality is expanded on in much more detail in Ken Suzuki’s Smooth Society and its Enemies: the idea that membership in an organization should not be treated as a “true-or-false” question. Instead, there should be different degrees of membership, and these different degrees would carry different benefits and different levels of obligation. This is an aspect of society that was always true, but becomes much more important in an internet-first world where our communities are no longer necessarily nested and fully overlapping. The larger theme of “Plurality” is developed in more detail in “Smooth Society and its Enemies” by Ken Suzuki:[* The idea is that membership in an organization should not be treated as a “true or false” issue. Rather, there should be different degrees of membership, and these different degrees should entail different benefits and different levels of obligations. This is an aspect of society that has always been true, but becomes much more important in an Internet-first world, where our communities are not necessarily nested and completely overlapping.
- Smooth Society and Its Enemies False dichotomy for “member or not.”
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「メンバーかどうか」は誤った二分法 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.